USE DESIGN blog

A while ago I have written about a Web service called Panoramio, allowing you to virtually visit the places on Earth by attaching user photographs to particular coordinates.
Google Streetview is an even more advanced way of virtually walking through places, except that not every place is so well documented as we would like it to be. But it definitely has an enchanting effect when, before traveling to some place you can actually see the building in which you are going to stay, up close, and even “walk” around it.
Now here is an online community, which not only collects photographs and pins them to a particular spot, but actually collects photographs of that place in the past. This is a Russian website called “Old Photographs of Moscow“. It uses a Google map and a community of passionate photo collectors who try to recreate the days bygone of their city. For each place, to which photographs are attached, the user can see them chronologically (”earlier” and “later” photos).
Now I am waiting for a service, in which you could not only “walk” through a street in an unfamiliar city but actually travel back in the history of that same street. Wouldn’t that be something. For instance, a certain place in old Moscow would look like this:

Voici un concept original pour vous indiquer le temps restant à patienter au feu rouge. De quoi limiter l’énervement quelques fois… Vous savez quand le feu tarde à passer au vert, surtout quand vous êtes en retard.





via yankodesign

Petite vidéo qui retrace le bel essor de cette entreprise qui commença avec un moteur de recherche, puis des applications web, des applications desktop avec Chrome ; un sytème d’exploitation mobile avec Android et aujourd’hui un logiciel GPS. Mais jusqu’où ils vont aller comme ça…

Attention, risque de queue à la machine à café… Voilà une proposition pour secouer la fourmilière des interfaces de machines à café qui semblent ne pas avoir évoluées depuis 25 ans.








La BeMoved, qui ne serait pas destinée à être commercialisé selon Douwe Egberts

Voici une jolie initiative, magnifiquement exécutée avec l’API de twitter, pour raviver la mémoire collective autour de la chute du mur de Berlin.





L’ironie fait qu’aujourd’hui chacun possède son mur (”wall”) sur Facebook pour communiquer avec ses proches et que le souvenir de la chute du mur nous est lui aussi rappelé avec un mur virtuel.
Le statut des murs a donc changé au XIXème siècle.

Copier coller | Copy and clone from louis rigaud on Vimeo.

Par louis rigaud

A Dutch startup Layar is introducing the “world’s first mobile augmented reality browser”. In this video you can see what this browser will do (for Android and HTC phones). Layar’s initiative is a product of collaboration between several partners, known as content providers, among them a real-estate firm, an insurance company and a bank. When you browse your augmented reality you are therefore informed on houses for sale and rent, ATM machines in the neighborhood (of the bank in question) and… well, insurance company offices. In Amsterdam, on an ordinary day, when cycling along a canal on your typically Dutch “grandma bicycle” one of the things you might want to know about the reality around you is indeed the closest place to have a health insurance.
This brings to mind the following question. If this is to be the future model for augmented reality, it will mean that the reality will not only be augmented by information on your surroundings but also by a very substantial amount of advertisement. Does this really make such a browser attractive?
This said, finding a place to live in the small and over-populated city of Amsterdam is a difficult task and an augmented reality browser allowing you to see the available property right along your daily cycling route might just be THE killer application.
Read more (in French): Réalité augmentée, le nouvel eldorado des smartphones, by Fred Cavazza

I do not understand China. Of course, I would have to first go there to try to understand it, but I don’t understand how it can work the way it works based on the information I read about it. I happened to read this  article on Techcruch: Why China Isn’t “The Next Silicon Valley”. It gives a very comprehensible analysis of the current state of technological and commercial development in China, stating that the phases through which the US went gradually (”…the television and media studios build out of the 1950s, the greed of the 1980s, the dot com bubble, the build out of physical and IT infrastructure, current Web 2.0 and CleanTech innovation”), China is now going through at once. Which inevitably forces the Chinese, who are a very adaptable and inventive nation, to find ways of earning money within multiple constraints and develop models that work in that – for us – crazy world. “No one assumes anyone will buy a CD, so they just look for other ways to make money. ” They don’t have the luxury of insisting on the old ways, as big Western studios do. They don’t have the old ways. There every way is new.

But this is not what makes China incomprehensible for me. It is this (also thank to Techcrunch): China shuts down Twitter and Bing in lead up to Tiananmen anniversary. Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, Bing are inaccessible as of yesterday. The government chooses to shut them down to avoid access to and spreading of information on politically sensitive matters.

These two notions, one of a wildly flourishing capitalism and the dictatorial communist structure of cutting off the information arteries, what makes China incomprehensible for me. You see, I am from the old paradigm. Roughly half of my life I spent in a communist country and the other half in highly developed democratic European countries. For me cutting off Web access and advanced economical development just do not go together. For me openness equals economical growth and closeness equals economical stagnation, brain drain and suffocation.

Once I had a chance to ask a Chinese colleague this question. She replied that she and the people she knew concentrated on economical development (and their personal one) and ignored the political context. They went about their business and let the government be what it is. I suppose this is the only way to survive – for now – this schizophrenia.

Interesting article by Tim McCoy

IDEO’s Bill Moggridge made a comment last week after a screening of Objectified that hit close to home. To paraphrase, he said interaction design has become pervasive, that anyone and everyone can be an interaction designer, and so the role of professional interaction designer is (or is becoming) unnecessary.

So, is Interaction Design a dead-end job?

Related:
Why Interaction Design?

Is Industrial Design the New Interface Design?


What do you think ?

In the past years we have seen that every online community that starts as free and open, sooner or later becomes an advertising platform.
Take YouTube. First it was a place to publish the video of your funny cat for the world to see. Now, beside being a collection of everyone’s funny cats, YouTube is an advertising channel for business, celebrities, broadcasting channels and political institutions. That’s fine. I can ignore them, if I want to, or use them to enrich my experience.
Take Facebook. Invented to connect college buddies it recently moved to the next phase, in which a company has the same kind of page as you and your buddies, functioning just as “another friend”, starting groups and promoting events. That sort of puts me off a little, but I can ignore them, too. I don’t have to befriend everybody.
Now take Wikipedia. The (French) article Pharmaceutical industry manipulates Wikipedia reveals the pharma industry’s marketing strategy for Wikipedia and shows how a subtle text manipulation can establish good reputation for a drug, discredit its competitors and conceal negative side effects.
Now, the problem with Wikipedia is that wherever you go on the site you, like Forrest Gump, “never know whatcha gonna get.” We all know that Wikipedia is written by everybody and we all know that the information might be incomplete and biased. But we still hope that somehow it will be okay.
Well, it’s not.
The rule that any open community is eventually used by somebody to make money is a reality. But Wikipedia is one of those communities which might not survive this shift because it discredits the whole idea.
Related reading: Eric Goldman “Doomed: why Wikipedia will fail“